XML FeedsNot too many moons ago when I started out with SQL Server I was convinced that there was a memory leak inside SQL Server. I ran it locally and the RAM usage just keep growing and growing until my computer was so slow that I had to restart SQL Server. This fixed things for a while but after I ran some poorly written queries it would spike up again and stay high.
There are question about this in forums/fora/newgroups all the time, people think that the sqlserver.exe process has a gigantic memory leak. This is just not true, the reason SQL Server will use as much memory as it can possible grab is that it is much more expensive to read from disk than from RAM. This is also the reason that you want as much RAM as you can afford to make SQL Server happy (and your customers). If your database is not gigantic it is possible that all your data could be in RAM.
How do you know you need more RAM?
Take a look at your Buffer Cache Hit Ratio, ideally you want to be at 95% plus.
Mine right now is 99.927 which is very good. To look at the Buffer Cache Hit Ratio you need to open up Performance in Control Panel-->Administrative Tools. Click on the + to add a new counter, from the Performance object select SQL Server: Buffer Manager, from the Select counters from list select buffer cache hit ratio
Take a look at the screen shot below if the text is too confusing
So in the end there is no memory leak, because RAM is so much faster than disk SQL Server will use all it can grab. Solid State Disks might change that in the future but for now these Solid State Disks are not large enough
If you are running SQL Server on your local machine make sure that you cap the memory it can use to something like 500MB or 25% less than the total memory on the machine. This will prevent it from slowing down your machine.
*** If you have a SQL related question try our Microsoft SQL Server Programming forum or our Microsoft SQL Server Admin forum
Denis has been working with SQL Server since version 6.5. Although he worked as an ASP/JSP/ColdFusion developer before the dot com bust, he has been working exclusively as a database developer/architect since 2002. In addition to English, Denis is also fluent in Croatian and Dutch, but he can curse in many other languages and dialects (just ask the SQL optimizer) He lives in Princeton, NJ with his wife and three kids.
Well put and concise. It's amazing how many server techs blame SQL for issues. I end up having to explain this all the time. 
I ain't no MSSQL techie, but always wondered why this happened. Thanks. 
This is also why it is a bad idea to run your SQL Server and your Web Application on the same physical server. 
I had someone ask about this just a few days ago, and having never actually looked at the task manager for SQL Server, I was thrown for a few minutes (server was running fine, figured if the network guys thought memory usage was a problem, it must be - big mistake!).
Alex, yes I give SQL about 1 GB (out of 2)on one machine which I use for development. On the other one I give it 1.5 GB (out of 2) since it is primarly used as a SQL dev box by me and I almost never get onto the box itself 
Can you explain the last phrase? How do you cap the memory it can use? 
Brilliant! Clear/concise explanation. Bottom line, if you're serious about your database server, then let it run on a box by itself and give it plenty of breathing space, i.e. RAM, CPU, and disk space, and watch it fly.
LTD Social Sitings
Note: Watch for social icons on posts by your favorite authors to follow their postings on these and other social sites.