Less Than Dot is a community of passionate IT professionals and enthusiasts dedicated to sharing technical knowledge, experience, and assistance. Inside you will find reference materials, interesting technical discussions, and expert tips and commentary. Once you register for an account you will have immediate access to the forums and all past articles and commentaries.
Your profile
Tag cloud
.net .net 3.5 .net 4.0 2003 access modifiers beginners book buildup c# excel f# linq microsoft reporting engine nhibernate nhprof nunit programming reflection reportviewer resharper rhino mocks structuremap threading unit testing vb.net vb.net. visual studio 2010 windows forms windows presentation foundation wpf
Authors
- chrissie1 (122)

- SQLDenis (17)

- Alex Ullrich (8)

- chaospandion (4)

- George Mastros (1)

- chopstik (1)

- tarwn (1)

- remou (1)

- More...
Main Categories
Search
Google Ads
Tags: c#
I don't know how many times I've put together the same slow regexp to check if the user input is a valid phone number. I decided that this cannot go on and developed a simple phone number primitive. Now our main concern here is the performance of TryParse since it will be used the most. After running some performance tests the median timing was 400ns on a 3Ghz machine.
Are you waiting for .NET 4.0 to take advantage of lazy initialization? Now you don't have to. The question you need to ask yourself is why haven't I already made this myself?
Aren't we all a little lazy?
Update: I added some code to handle DBNulls.
With the upcoming release of .NET 4.0 we will be seeing the new dynamic type introduced. The dynamic type bypasses static type checking and is instead checked at run-time. It was introduced to improve interoperability with dynamic languages like IronPython as well as simplifying the usage COM APIs that return objects such as the Microsoft Office API. How can we take advantage of this in other areas? ADO.NET is a perfect candidate for taking advantage of the dynamic type. The following code lays out the ground work for a n...
I had the need to create a setup that changed my app.config file. In actual fact I wanted to create several setup files which I could then send to the user so that it would install the same program but with a small difference in the app.config file. And I also did not want any user input for this else I could have easily done it with just one setupproject. I don't trust users to enter the correct value.
So I created 2 setup projects. One that doesn't change anything and the other that changes the app.config file.
I got a nice little exam question today. It was supposed to be all about C# but that's another story.
One of the real C# questions was this.
:: Next >>


LTD Social Sitings
Note: Watch for social icons on posts by your favorite authors to follow their postings on these and other social sites.